Peed v. Bennett
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDowell, J.
Appellants filed their action in replevin in the court below alleging that they were the owners and entitled to the immediate possession of a gas stove and an electric refrigerator, then alleged to be in the possession of appellees who were detaining same unlawfully from appellants.
Trial was to the court without jury resulting in finding and judgment in favor of appellees.
Error assigned is the overruling of the motion for new trial which, among other specifications, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of the decision.
Considered in the light most favorable to appellees…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mills v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Pea v. PeaIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. FretzIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Citizens Bank v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Green, Etc. v. Gibson Cir. Ct.Indiana Supreme Court · 1965
- State Highway Commission v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Empire Gas of Rochester, Inc. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Vic Bernacchi & Sons, Inc. v. Loxas (In Re Vic Bernacchi & Sons, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- 11438 Highway 50, LLC, successor in interest to Regions Bank, successor by merger to Union Planters Bank, N.A., successor in interest to NBD Bank, N.A. v. Timothy John LuttrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.