Legal Opinion

People v. Lind

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 2014No. B250350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J. *

Penal Code section 995, subdivision (a)(2)(A) requires the trial court to set aside an information if the defendant is not legally committed by a magistrate. * 1 Section 859b requires a preliminary hearing to be held within 60 days of the entry of a not guilty plea unless time has been personally waived by the defendant. Here, we determine that a defendant’s motion to disqualify the magistrate for cause tolls the time limit for a preliminary hearing.

The People appeal the trial court’s order granting Jeffery Cowen Lind’s and Dee Thomas Murphy’s (Respondents) motion to set…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Ng v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. StandishCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. FigueroaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Dumas v. L.A. County Bd. of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. Alvarez CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Byrd CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Moreno CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API