Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Company v. Jones

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 12, 1934No. 4-3407PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

This suit was instituted -by appellees against appellant, Sinclair Refining Company, to recover damages alleged to have accrued by reason of false, malicious and fraudulent claims and assertions by appellant of a valid and effectual leasehold contract upon and against a certain leasehold interest owned and possessed by appellees in and to a certain gasoline service station located in the city of Harrison, Arkansas.

The case was tried to a jury, and they were warranted in finding the- following facts from the evidence:

That on and prior to February 9, 1933, appellees owned a certain leasehold…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Tempe v. Pilot Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. LuckelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Fleming v. Cox Law FirmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Elliott v. ElliottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Hicks v. EarlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API