Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Kim

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 25, 2003No. Civ.A. 00C-08-226PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DEL PESCO, J.

This is a claim for personal injuries filed by plaintiff, Diane M. Rowe (“Rowe”) against Kyo Ahn Kim. M.D., (“Dr.Kim”) a plastic and cosmetic surgeon. The plaintiff claims the she did not give informed consent to the procedure performed on her by Dr. Kim. After a three day trial, a verdict was returned in favor of Dr. Kim. Plaintiff seeks a new trial.

Factual Background

The evidence at trial demonstrates that the chronology surrounding this litigation began two years prior to the endoscopic brow lift and laser procedure about which Rowe now complains.

In 1996, Rowe consulted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Albany Urology Clinic, P.C. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. State v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Barriocanal v. GibbsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. McCloskey v. McKelveySuperior Court of Delaware · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bank v. MickelsNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Bank v. MickelsNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Bank v. MickelsNebraska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API