Legal Opinion

Bank v. Mickels

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2019No. S-18-427Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/19/2019 08:08 AM CDT - 1009 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports BANK v. MICKELS Cite as

302 Neb. 1009

Carl Bank and Teresa M. Bank, appellants, v. Jason J. M ickels, M.D., and Omaha Orthopedic Clinic & Sports Medicine, P.C., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 25, 2019. No. S-18-427. 1. Expert Witnesses: Appeal and Error. The standard for reviewing the admissibility of expert testimony is abuse of discretion. 2. Jury Instructions: Appeal and Error. Whether a jury instruction is correct is a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kovacs v. FreemanKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Wisner v. Vandelay Invs., L.L.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. David v. DeLeonNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Eccleston v. ChaitNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hemsley v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API