Legal Opinion

State, Department of Motor Vehicles v. Gober

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1973No. 9696-9700PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McMANUS, Chief Justice.

This appeal concerns the New Mexico Implied Consent Act, § 64-22-2,4 et seq., N.M.S.A. 1953. Gober, Grisolano, Lee, Stivers and Warren (“appellees”) refused to submit to chemical tests to determine the alcoholic content of their blood. Pursuant to the above statutory provisions, and because of their refusals to submit to tests, each appellee’s license was revoked. Each appellee then obtained a hearing before an agent of appellant Commissioner of Motor Vehicles (“Commissioner”) at which testimony was received in support of and in opposition to the revocation. From…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PandoliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. In Re SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Durrett v. PetritsisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Swisher v. DardenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Bell v. WareNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. BishopNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Village of Park Forest v. AngelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Foster v. Board of DentistryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fugere v. State, Taxation & Revenue Department, Motor Vehicle DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Rowley v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API