Legal Opinion

Poe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1924No. 8258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

— Conviction is for manufacturing whisky, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

No question was raised in the lower court relative to the presentment of the indictment, but appellant now attempts to raise on appeal a complaint that the record fails to show that the indictment was presented by a grand jury in open court. He refers us to Hardy v. State, 1 Tex. Crim. App., 556; English v. State, 18 S. W., 678; Hollingsworth v. State, 87 Tex. Crim. Rep., 399, 221 S. W., 978; Hickock v. State, 95 Tex. Crim. Rep., 173, 253 S. W., 823. All of these cases show that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Hollingsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Rowlett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  4. Rather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  5. Murphey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hullum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Hullum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API