Breeden v. Independent Fire Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
This civil action presents for solution the question of the admissibility, in a civil action, of a declaration against penal interest.
I
This issue arises in the context of a civil suit by insured property owners seeking to recover the full coverage under a standard fire insurance policy, wherein the defendant insurance company’s sole defense was arson.
The case was tried to the court and jury and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals unanimously reversed.
This controversy stems from the efforts by the defense to present the testimony of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Stubbs v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. SpriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. DotsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BakerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- State v. HaywoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CuretonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Agnew v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.