Legal Opinion

Slamen v. Castenada

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 17, 2024No. 3:22-cv-02589Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARK SLAMEN, Case No. 22-cv-02589-WHO (PR) Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING v. 9 DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; 10 H. CASTENADA, et al., Defendants. ORDER REFERRING THIS ACTION TO 11 JUDGE ILLMAN FOR SETTLEMENT 12 Dkt. No. 22 13 14 INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Mark Slamen alleges in this

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action that a prison guard, 16 defendant H. Castaneda, violated his Eighth Amendment rights by using excessive force 17 on him and by denying him medical care.1 Slamen also contends that Castaneda’s actions 18…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API