Legal Opinion

Urban Renewal Agency v. Spines

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1968No. 45,171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

The matter herein arises out of an appeal from the award of court-appointed appraisers in a condemnation action filed by the Urban Renewal Agency of Wichita, Kansas.

The question before the court is whether evidence showing an increase in real estate values resulting from private improvement on property in the vicinity of the condemned property should be excluded in arriving at the fair market value of the condemned property.

The facts have been stipulated by the parties.

The Urban Renewal Agency of the Wichita, Kansas, Metropolitan Area…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Brick v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Steck v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Love v. Common School District No. 28Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Paulk v. Housing Authority of City of TupeloMississippi Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Condemnation of Land for School Purposes Ridglea, Inc. v. Unified School District No. 305Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  3. Lapham v. Urban Renewal AgencySupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API