Legal Opinion

Lapham v. Urban Renewal Agency

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1973No. 46,879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the condemners from a jury award of $39,000 for the property in question.

The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal primarily for the failure of the appellants to give notice of hearing under our Rule 6 (p) of their application to the district judge for an extension of time to file the record on appeal. An order was made ecc parte by the district judge granting a 30-day extension. While the rule provides for notice to “the other parties” of the application for extension of time, the provision could hardly be considered jurisdictional in the sense of depriving the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Condemnation of Land for School Purposes Ridglea, Inc. v. Unified School District No. 305Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Urban Renewal Agency v. SpinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. Willard J. Kiser Living TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Willard J. Kiser Living TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API