Legal Opinion

Chessman v. Teets

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 31, 1956No. 34375PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus herein was denied by this Court on January 4, 1955 upon the ground that, as a matter of law, it did not tender a federal question. Application of Chessman, 128 F.Supp. 600. The Court of Appeal of this Circuit, en banc, affirmed, 221 F.2d 276. On October 17, 1955, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeal and remanded the cause here for a hearing. 350 U.S. 3, 76 S.Ct. 34. On November 30, 1955, pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, and, upon application of counsel for petitioner, we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Chessman v. TeetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Chessman v. PeopleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. State of Oregon, Ex Rel. Earl Sherwood v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden of the Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. In RE WHITE v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API