Sandoval v. Qualcomm Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtBenke, J.
*272*385Plaintiff Jose M. Sandoval was severely burned by an "arc flash" from a live circuit breaker while working with contractor TransPower Testing, Inc., and its principal, Frank Sharghi (sometimes collectively, TransPower),1 at a cogeneration plant owned by defendant Qualcomm Incorporated (Qualcomm). The jury returned a special verdict finding that Qualcomm retained control over the safety conditions at the jobsite; that it negligently exercised such control; and that its negligence was a substantial factor in causing Sandoval's harm. The jury found Sandoval's employer, ROS Electrical Supply…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Strouse v. Webcor Constr., L.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Sandoval v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Siry Investment v. FarkhondehpourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Siry Investment v. FarkhondehpourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Strouse v. Webcor ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019