Spencer v. Coconino County Superior Court
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
This special action was filed after the respondent trial court denied petitioner’s motion to dismiss a two-count indictment which he urged was duplicitous and, therefore, unconstitutionally vague. The indictment charges incest and child molestation in the following language:
Count I
From July, 1979 through January, 1983, KENNETH RICHARD SPENCER, and Kandy Spencer persons within the degrees of consaguintity [sic] within [which] marriages are declared by [law] to be incestuous and void, knowingly committed fornication in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-3608, 13-701, and 13-801, a class 4…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. AxleyArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- People v. BarlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WhitneyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Baines v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.