Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Coconino County Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1983No. 16609-SAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

This special action was filed after the respondent trial court denied petitioner’s motion to dismiss a two-count indictment which he urged was duplicitous and, therefore, unconstitutionally vague. The indictment charges incest and child molestation in the following language:

Count I

From July, 1979 through January, 1983, KENNETH RICHARD SPENCER, and Kandy Spencer persons within the degrees of consaguintity [sic] within [which] marriages are declared by [law] to be incestuous and void, knowingly committed fornication in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-3608, 13-701, and 13-801, a class 4…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. AxleyArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. People v. BarlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. WhitneyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Baines v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State of Arizona v. Rohan Livingston ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API