Legal Opinion

Bielenberg v. Higgins

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1929No. 6,457PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an action to recover judgment for money paid by N. J. Bielenberg as accommodation maker of a promissory note for $29,000, made by W. I. Higgins as principal obligor, and to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants W. I. Higgins and Alma M. Higgins, his wife, to secure N. J. Bielenberg against liability on the note. The court sustained a general demurrer to the amended complaint filed by the defendant bank, and a general and special demurrer filed by the defendants W. I. and Alma M. Higgins. Judgment was entered for defendants, and this appeal followed.

No argument having been presented…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noyes v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Bielenberg v. HigginsMontana Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hodgkiss v. Northland Petroleum ConsolidatedMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Archer v. LaMarch Creek RanchMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kipp v. PaulMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Maryland Cas. Co. v. Walsh, Adm.Montana Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API