Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Zero

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 23, 2001No. 00 C 2750Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

This previously-dismissed action is at an end except for the unresolved question of the amount of fees and litigation expenses to be awarded to plaintiffs as prevailing parties. There is no question as to their prevailing party status: As the result of the preliminary injunction that this Court entered after an extensive hearing (the extended findings of fact and conclusions of law are reported at 110 F.Supp.2d 716-42 (N.D.Ill.2000)), plaintiffs obtained all of the relief that they sought in this litigation, including them retention as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bagby v. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Quentin Young v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Doe v. TerhuneDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  5. McCormick v. ZeroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API