Legal Opinion
Doe v. Terhune
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 28, 2000No. CIV. A. 96-6099PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.
This matter is before this court on the motion of plaintiff John Doe for costs and attorneys’ fees in the amount of $65,495.63. For the reasons contained herein, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
On December 31, 1996, plaintiff filed an emergency application seeking to prevent the New Jersey Bureau of Parole from notifying his employer of plaintiffs parole status following a sexual offense conviction. Invoking federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and civil rights jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a), plaintiff…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Safety Components, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- First Penn-Pacific Life v. William R. EvansDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- GELIS v. BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- MOSQUITO HUNTERS, LLC v. KELWOOD, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- McCormick v. ZeroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001