Legal Opinion

Marion County v. Anderson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Special Justice Davis

delivered the opinion of the Court.

These two cases involve an identical question of law only, and they may he disposed of together.

In each case, the plaintiffs sue Marion county for the value of land taken by the commissioner of highways and public works, and for incidental damages resulting from such taking; the land being taken for the improvement of United States Highway No. 41, which is a state aid project on the road from Jasper to Chattanooga.

The cases were tried upon an agreed statement of facts, it being agreed in each case that the lands of the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Phillips v. Marion CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Baker v. DoneganTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Baker v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Baker v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Cocke CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
  2. Daniels v. TalentTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Unicoi County v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Bedford County v. RoseboroughCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. City of Charleston v. AileyTennessee Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API