Legal Opinion

Baker v. Donegan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1932PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was begun in 1929, by petition of the Commissioner of Highways and Public Works of the State, seeking condemnation under the law of eminent domain of certain lands of Donegan, for highway purposes. The action was successfully prosecuted, and a jury of view assessed the damages. At the time the report of the jury of view was filed the existing statutes placed the burden of payment for the land taken upon the County of Dickson. The county excepted to the report of the jury of view, and demanded a jury trial in the circuit court upon the question of the amount of the damages to which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peerless Construction Co. v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Baker v. Hickman CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Mayor of Morristown v. Hamblen CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Amos v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Phillips v. Marion CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Brooksbank v. LeechTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Baker v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API