Winslow v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
From the Criminal Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. Wm.,11. Parks. The appellant in this case, Charles Winslow, was, as . is stated in the opinion, convicted under section 8757 of the Code. The prosecution was commenced by complaint made before a justice of the peace against the defendant by one Cornelia Hall.
Read the full summary
From the Criminal Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. Wm.,11. Parks. The appellant in this case, Charles Winslow, was, as . is stated in the opinion, convicted under section 8757 of the Code. The prosecution was commenced by complaint made before a justice of the peace against the defendant by one Cornelia Hall. On the trial of the case, as is shown by the bill of exceptions, there was testimony going to show that the minor, Anderson Smedley, for the enticement of whom the defenclant was prosecuted, was hired to other parties in the neighborhood of the defendant, previous to and at the time…
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
-The defendant was convicted for knowingly interfering with, hiring, employing, enticing away, or inducing a “minor to leave the service of any person to whom such service is lawfully due,” &c., as prohibited by section 3757 of the Criminal Code. The facts are, the father deserted his family some fourteen or fifteen years before the beginning of the prosecution, and has never lived with them since, or claimed the custody of, or exercised any control over, his child. The mother has had-entire control, and by her own labor raised and maintained her son during the time he was unable to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bank of Phoenix City v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Cofer v. EnsorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Lockridge v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- McGhee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
- Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.