Legal Opinion

State v. McCloud

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 2003No. 3625PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoolsby, J.

Douglas Edward McCloud appeals his conviction for criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature (CDVHAN), arguing the indictment did not enumerate the elements of the offense and was therefore insufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction on the trial court. We affirm.

The indictment was captioned “INDICTMENT FOR CRIMINAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — AGGRAVATED.” The body of the indictment read as follows: “That Douglas Edward McCloud did in Fairfield County on or about June 16, 2000 commit an act of violence against Kermisha L. Golden, by striking her in [the] face with his closed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. WilkesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. State v. WadeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. McCloudCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API