Legal Opinion

Ross v. Oliver Bros. & Honeycutt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 25, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Jassamine Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

At the time the accident under investigation occurred th’e appellees were engaged in masking a fill. The material used in' the fill was obtained from nearby land and then loaded .on oars and transported to the fill. In Obtaining the material a steam shovel was used', which was operated by stationary engines, three of which were located seme distance back of the shovel, and one near the boom from which the .shovel was .suspended. The engines back of t'he shovel were in Charge of an engineer, and the one located at the (boom was in charge of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spitze v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  2. Western Manufacturing Co. v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Maxfield v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Bates v. HarteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Enterprise Foundry & MacHine Works v. Miners' Elkhorn Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Addison v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Hooks v. Cornett Lewis Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Brown v. Union Central Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Canning v. STAR PUBLISHING COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API