Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. MARINE CARRIERS CORPORATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1971No. Civ. A. 70-2261PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MASTERSON, District Judge.

This action was instituted by Seymour Hamilton, a seaman, to recover damages from defendant, his employer, under the Jones Act, 1 and general maritime law as a result of an accident which Hamilton sustained on-February 20, 1969.

Hamilton contends that defendant is liable to him for personal injuries which he claims were caused by (1) the negligence of the defendant and/or his agents and (2) the unseaworthiness of defendant’s vessel. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment which is presently before this court. For purposes of the motion, we…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bates v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1972
  2. Szopko v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bush v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  4. Ellis v. Tall Ships Charleston LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
  5. Szopko v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API