Legal Opinion

Gettys v. Town of Marion

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1940PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNhill, J.

While it is alleged that the upright end of the hollow cylinder composing the meter box has a groove about 1% to 2 inches deep on its upper end in which the lid or cap is supposed to fit when placed thereon, there is no evidence that the cap was not in fact properly placed in the groove or that it was otherwise defective in construction or in maintenance. The plaintiff relies upon the happening of the event as evidence tending to show that the meter box top was not properly placed or was in defective condition by reason of the sand which had washed or blown on it, coupled with the fact that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Concord.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Watkins v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Houston v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Carvin v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. City of Atlanta v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Marshall v. City of CentraliaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wood Ex Rel. Putnam v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Matternes v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Smith v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Mosseller v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API