Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fortenbaugh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 2013PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

The Superior Court erred in this case when it overturned the jury verdict and vacated the judgment of sentence based on two references at trial to requests that the defendant take a polygraph test. Because we find the references were not prejudicial, we reverse the Superior Court’s order and remand for reinstatement of the trial court’s judgment of sentence.

Jack W. Fortenbaugh, II was charged with rape and other related offenses for incidents involving the sexual abuse of his stepdaughter. Fortenbaugh first abused her when she was approximately 12 years old, and again in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. CammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Cash, O., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. Cash, O., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Anderson, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API