Legal Opinion

Stults v. Forst

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1893No. 16,340PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From tbe Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The facts in this case, as found by the court, and not questioned by the parties, are as follows:

1. That Conrad Forst died in Huntington county, Indiana, intestate, on May 15, 1873, leaving as his heirs at law his widow, Sarah Forst, and their children, the appellee Alfred Forst and others, and seized, in fee, of certain described real estate, being eighty acres of land in said county; that one John Stults was appointed administrator of said estate; and there being no assets in his hands to pay certain indebtedness of the estate, in pursuance of a petition and order of court, he sold the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. PortIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Cincinnati, Richmond, & Fort Wayne Railroad v. HeastonIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Stults v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Montgomery v. AydelotteIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yelton v. PlantzIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Moore v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Diamond Block Coal Co. v. EdmonsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Continental Nat. Bank v. HeilmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  5. Johnston, Admx. v. Wabash Valley Trust Co., Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API