Legal Opinion
United States v. Lundberg
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided June 27, 1978No. CM 436159PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW
COOK, Judge:
Appellant was found guilty, in conformity with his pleas, of one specification of conspiracy (Article 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice (USMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 881), three specifications of forging checks (Article 123, UCMJ), four specifications of larceny (Article 121, UCMJ), and one specification of AWOL (Article 86, UCMJ).
On appeal appellant contends that the court-martial was without jurisdiction with respect to any of the alleged offenses, ex*771cept the unauthorized absence, under the rationale of O’Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258, 89 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. WagerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. RiosU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. MooreU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. WeiseU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. DoaneUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.