Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Doane

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 2, 2001No. ACM 33234Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBreslin, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds, in effect, that this commander was empowered to prevent the appellant from going out the gate, but was powerless to prevent him from going to his grave. However, the majority’s decision fails to recognize the unique aspects of the system of justice created by Congress and implemented by the President to meet the special needs of the armed forces.

Facts

The appellant sexually molested his daughter for years, beginning in 1993 when she was only 12 years old. In August 1997, after a particularly aggressive sexual assault, the child reported the abuse to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API