Legal Opinion

Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. v. Oceanic Petroleum Source Pte Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 27, 2009No. 09 Civ. 4271 (JSR)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.

On April 30, 2009, plaintiff Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. Ltd. (“Hyundai”) filed this action seeking an order of maritime attachment against defendant The Oceanic Petroleum Source Pte Ltd. (“Oceanic”). On May 4, 2009, the Court issued an Order of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment (the “Attachment Order”). On May 20, 2009, by letter application, defendant moved to vacate the Attachment Order on the ground that defendant is subject to suit in a “convenient adjacent jurisdiction” — namely, the Northern District of New York — because defendant has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aqua Stoli Shipping Ltd. v. Gardner Smith Pty Ltd., Docket No. 05-5385-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Integrated Container Service, Inc. v. Starlines Container Shipping, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  3. STX Panocean (UK) Co. v. Glory Wealth Shipping Pte Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Seawind Compania, S.A. v. Crescent Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Swiss Marine Services S.A. v. Louis Dreyfus Energy Services L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peninsula Petroleum Far East Pte. Ltd. v. Crystal Cruises, LLC Star Cruises (HK) LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API