Legal Opinion
Hattersley v. American Nucleonics Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1992No. B055863PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Thomas Hattersley appeals from an order dismissing his cross-complaint for failure to bring the action to trial within three years after reversal on appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.320, subd. (a)(3).) We reverse and hold the three-year period was tolled three hundred fourteen days because of courtroom unavailability. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.340, subd, (c); Chin v. Meier (1991) 235 Cal.App.3d 1473, 1477-1478 [1 Cal.Rptr. 499]; Rose v. Scott (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 537, 542 [284 Cal.Rptr. 487].)
In 1982 respondent American Nucleonics Corporation sued appellant, a former employee,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989
- Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Weeks v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Brigante v. HuangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Tanguilig v. Neiman Marcus Grp., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.