Legal Opinion

Joy Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 29, 1956No. 12-4497Published

1Opinion of the Court

230 F.2d 740

JOY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 11696.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued November 17, 1955.

Decided February 29, 1956.

Harold R. Schmidt, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Don Rose, Rose, Rose & Houston, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

David O. Walter, Washington, D. C., (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

1

In determining a deficiency…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API