Oklahoma City v. Newell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice:
There is involved here an original proceeding to review an award allowing the respondent, claimant below, Bertha Marie Newell, death benefits under the provisions of the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Act. Respondent Bertha Marie Newell will be referred to herein as claimant and petitioner, City of Oklahoma City, as respondent, same being the respective relations the-parties bore to each other in the trial court.
The trial judge entered an award in favor of the claimant. The award was affirmed by the Industrial Court sitting en banc by a vote of three to two. The two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Wentz v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Ada Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. SneadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Spaur v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Payton v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Campbell v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Oklahoma City v. BoggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Oklahoma City v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- State v. EsparzaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010