Mitchell v. Citifinancial Mortgage Co.

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice BRIDGES.

This is an appeal of a judgment granting possession of certain premises to Citi-financial Mortgage Company. Appellants Mary Mitchell and all occupants of the premises in question contend in a single issue the trial court erred because the evidence supporting the judgment is insufficient. Specifically, appellants contend that Citifinancial’s complaint for forcible entry and detainer did not sufficiently describe the land or premises for which it sought possession. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The facts of this case are well known to the parties; thus,…