Legal Opinion

Hull v. Laine

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 4, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

Defendant in error has not favored us with a brief in this case. So this Court has been forced to consider this writ of error upon the arguments and contentions advanced by the plaintiff-in error alone, as supplemented by our own research of the record to ascertain the applicability of the plaintiff in error’s arguments to the proceedings reflected in the transcript.

It appears that this was a suit wherein plaintiffs below, husband and wife, recovered damages for personal injuries inflicted upon the person of the wife as the result, so it is claimed of the pleaded negligence of the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. NobleSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Walker, Et Vir. v. Smith, Eat Al.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Florida Cities Bus Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. The Miami Jockey Club v. Frances AikenSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Fayter v. Shore, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frazier v. Ewell Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API