Legal Opinion
People v. Hufnagel
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 9, 1987No. 87SA120PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MULLARKEY, Justice.
Pursuant to C.A.R. 4.1, the People challenge the trial court’s order granting the defendant Marc Hufnagel’s motions to suppress evidence obtained in two searches of his condominium. We reverse the suppression order and remand for further proceedings.
I
On October 21, 1986, Hufnagel was indicted by the grand jury on charges of selling cocaine and a warrant for his arrest was issued. In the afternoon of the same day, Sheriff Masters, Undersheriff Walters, and Sergeant Berg went to Hufna-gel’s condominium for the purpose of executing the arrest warrant. The officers did not have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- People v. FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. MurdockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. in the Interest of H.J.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- State v. HeinenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. SyrieSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- People v. GothardSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.