Legal Opinion

Ohio & Ross Township Road

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1895No. Appeal, No. 324PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 324, Oct. T., 1894, from order of Q. S. Allegheny Co., Dec. T., 1891, No. 5, confirming report of reviewers. Petition for public road. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was confirmation of report.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,

Owing to illness of the county engineer, who by special law *133was both viewer and artist, the first order to view was duly-extended and made returnable to June Sessions 1892, at which a report in favor of the proposed road was made, approved and width of road fixed at thirtj'-three feet. At September Sessions, a petition in due form was presented and reviewers were appointed, one of whom, John English, is admitted to be a signer of the original petition. Before said reviewers reported, the appointment of Mr. English was specifically excepted to, but it does…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prevost v. NichollsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1808
  2. In the Case of a Road in Radnor & NewtownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Columbus Township RoadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. In re Public RoadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Brubaker v. Blair County Poor District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County1930
  4. Christner's PetitionSomerset County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1923
  5. Forty-Sixth WardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API