Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Goodill

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 6, 2011No. 411, 2010PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal, we consider the extent to which a plaintiff must prove causation to succeed in a medical negligence action based on lack of informed consent. Delaware’s informed consent statute codifies a health care provider’s duty to provide a patient with certain information about the alternatives and risks of a proposed treatment. A health care provider breaches that duty if it fails to provide information that would be material to the patient’s decision to undergo the proposed treatment. If the treatment is not successful, and the complication is one that should have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brzoska v. OlsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Culver v. BennettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  4. Chudnofsky v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  5. Barriocanal v. GibbsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Spicer v. OsunkoyaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. Amalfitano v. CocolinSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  3. Asaf Barkan v. Exabeam, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025
  4. Carroll v. Nanomech, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022
  5. Com. v. Boyd, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API