Legal Opinion

Wideman v. Garbarino

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1989No. CV-86-0611-SAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Holohan, Justice

(Retired).

The petitioner, a juvenile, filed a special action in this court to prevent the respondent judge from allowing the news media and public to attend a transfer hearing 1 in juvenile court. We ordered a stay of proceedings until oral argument could be heard on the petition. After argument, we vacated the stay order, denied the relief sought in the petition, and ordered that the proceedings in juvenile court “proceed in the manner determined by the respondent judge.” We indicated that an opinion would follow in due course. This is that opinion.

The relevant facts are that the petitioner…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Von Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Chapman v. Chattooga Oil Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API