Rhonda Potts v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
Appellant Rhonda Potts (“Potts”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment for Respondent City of St. Louis (“City”) on her claim for damages suffered after a fall on a city sidewalk. The trial court found that Potts did not provide the City adequate notice of her injuries as required by Section 82.210, 1 which defeated her claim. Potts contends that the notice she provided the City substantially complied with the statute’s notice requirements. Because we cannot conclude on the facts provided that Potts’s notice was deficient as a matter of law, we…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Lyons v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- METROPOLITAN NATIONAL BANK v. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Travis v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Williams v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rachel Sender v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023