Legal Opinion

Travis v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 12, 1973No. 56427PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

In the trial court, defendant filed its Motion For Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 55.39, V.A. M.R., the same was sustained, and plaintiff has appealed.

Factually, it appears that on January 6, 1966, plaintiff fell and suffered personal injuries near the intersection of 10th and Main Streets in Kansas City, Missouri, allegedly due to defendant’s negligence in the maintenance of its public sidewalk.

In this connection, Section 82.210, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., provides: “No action shall be maintained against any city of this state which now has or may hereafter…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Randolph v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. Brickell v. KANSAS CITY, MOSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Plater v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Findley v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Schumer Ex Rel. Schumer v. City of PerryvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Dorlon v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Williams v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Paula Diane Robinson v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API