State v. Page
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Defendant was convicted of one count of possession a slugging device, ORS 166.510. 1 He appeals, alleg-g three assignments of error: (1) denial of his motion suppress certain items found in his car; (2) error in erruling his demurrer, based on the ground that the itute in question is an infringement upon the con-tutional right to bear arms and further on the ound that the statute was unconstitutionally vague its use of the term "billy”; (3) error in overruling the fendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal, argu- % that the instruments (ax handles) introduced as idence in the present case…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. PruettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. TusekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- City of Portland v. StorholtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981