Legal Opinion

State v. Page

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 1979No. M 78-1046, CA 13971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Defendant was convicted of one count of possession a slugging device, ORS 166.510. 1 He appeals, alleg-g three assignments of error: (1) denial of his motion suppress certain items found in his car; (2) error in erruling his demurrer, based on the ground that the itute in question is an infringement upon the con-tutional right to bear arms and further on the ound that the statute was unconstitutionally vague its use of the term "billy”; (3) error in overruling the fendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal, argu- % that the instruments (ax handles) introduced as idence in the present case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PruettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. State v. TusekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. City of Portland v. StorholtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API