State v. Pruett
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*185GILLETTE, J.
Defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon in violation of ORS 166.240(1).1 The complaint charged that he:
“* * * did unlawfully, recklessly and with criminal negligence carry concealed about his person, a knife, other than an ordinary pocketknife, which could be used to injure the person and property of another * * (Emphasis added.)
Defendant demurred to the complaint, claiming that the emphasized language — which is a direct quote from the statute — is unconstitutionally vague and that the statute is therefore void. The demurrer was overruled, and defendant thereafter…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. DrummondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. MellingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Commonwealth v. MillerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Gaffey v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. BorowskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.