Legal Opinion

Maguire v. Whillock

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1942No. 6898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C.J.

— In the trial court respondent, trustee for the owner of all the remaining unpaid bonds of the special or local improvement district involved, successfully sued out a writ of mandamus to compel appellant to reassess, under the second paragraph of section 49-2726 I. C. A., 1 the property in the district to recoup, in the first cause of action, a claimed mistaken or inadvertent deficiency of $2796.55 in the assessment, security for the payment of the principal of the district’s bonds, and in the second cause $3220.20 asserted rightful interest thereon.

Appellants unavailingly urged that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Tobin v. Town CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Goody Ex Rel. Goody v. Maryland Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Reynard v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co. v. BergIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Utah Oil Refining Co. v. HendrixIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Robbins v. Joint Class A. School Dist. No. 331Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API