Legal Opinion
United States v. Clinton Harless, AKA Stephen Lisnak, AKA Alexander Dyle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1972No. 71-2789PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
Raising certain constitutional questions with reference to search and sei zure and confrontation, and other issues with reference to procedure, Harless appeals his adjudication as a juvenile delinquent under 18 U.S.C. § 5031 et seq.
BACKGROUND
Due to a misrepresentation as to his age, appellant was indicted on November 2, 1970, for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708 (possession of a stolen postal money order). He was tried by a jury and found guilty on June 19, 1971. On August 23, 1971, it was learned that appellant was a juvenile at the time of the commission of the offense…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Richard Norton Sherwin, Dba Marquis Publishing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Angela Luz GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- James L. Gorum v. Walter E. Craven, Warden, Folsom State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- State v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1976
- Herbert J. Turner v. Walter E. Craven, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.