Legal Opinion

Riley v. Turpin

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1956No. S. F. 19261PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant appeals from an interlocutory judgment in partition under which certain real property is ordered sold and the proceeds divided between plaintiff and defendant according to a formula set forth in the judgment. We have concluded that the judgment is correct except as to computation of the percentages of the proceeds to which the respective parties are entitled, but that a reversal is required for further proceedings to permit correction of the error.

In February, 1941, Arthur Brand and Hallie Turpin (defendant) entered into a written agreement whereby a home owned by Brand would…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. McDonald v. MorleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Estate of KemmerrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Willmon v. KoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Giacomelos v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Snider v. BasingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Forrest v. ElamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Riley v. TurpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API