Legal Opinion

(PC) Franklin v. Tate

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 21, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01170Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY FRANKLIN, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01170-AWI-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 13 v. ) TO COMPEL ) 14 HAROLD TATE, (ECF No. 36) ) 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) 17 Plaintiff Jeffrey Franklin is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel, filed on March 12, 2021. 20 I. 21 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 22 This action is proceeding against Defendant Tate for retaliation and deliberate indifference to a 23…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
Bobby Ray Kines v. Fred Butterworth, Ronald St. Pierre v. Fred ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.