Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1991No. 91AP-15PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Pearly L. Wilson, appeals from the judgment of the Court of Claims, entered on December 14, 1990, which granted the defendantappellee’s cross-motion for summary judgment.
Two assignments of error are raised:
“(1) The Court of Claims of Ohio clearly abused its discretion when it denied plaintiff-appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel holding that: a) the rules of this court do not provide a mechanism for such appointment; and b) that plaintiff has failed to show any ‘exceptional circumstances’ which would justify appointment of counsel.
“(2) The trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Martin v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Knecht v. Vandalia Medical Center, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Perotti v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Skorvanek v. Dept. of Rehab & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- In the Matter of Burton S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Woods v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Elkins v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- MacConnell v. London Corr. Inst.Ohio Court of Claims · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.