Legal Opinion

United States v. Noble

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided May 18, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

On August 6, 1935, defendants herein, Samuel L. Samschick, Joseph Mandl, and Joseph Girard, were indicted by a federal grand jury and charged with conspiring, with oth.ers, to defraud the United States of a tax due on denatured alcohol withdrawn under permit. The defendants above named have entered separate pleas in bar in each of which it is in substance alleged that he was “involuntarily and compulsorily and against his will” compelled to give testimony in an investigation by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of the United States concerning the tax liability of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. United States v. Armour & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ChaplinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
  2. United States v. HaramicDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API