Legal Opinion

Marriage of Durand v. Durand

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1985No. C0-85-20Published

1Opinion of the Court

367 N.W.2d 621 (1985)

In re the Marriage of Myles B. DURAND, Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

Patricia A. DURAND, Respondent.

No. C0-85-20.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 14, 1985.

Dianne Wright, New Brighton, for appellant.

James H. Hennessy, Dale M. Wagner, Barnett, Ratelle, Hennessy, VanderVort, Stasel & Herzog, Minneapolis, Roger A. Peterson, Joseph B. Nierenberg, amicus curiae, Minnesota Police Pension Council, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and HUSPENI, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant husband Myles Durand appeals…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. In Re the Marriage of DuBois v. DuBoisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Marriage of Castonguay v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Ronnkvist v. RonnkvistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API