Legal Opinion
Richter v. Danbury Hospital
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 3, 2000No. AC 19090PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Michael W. Richter, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant Danbury Hospital (hospital).1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court, in granting the motion as to the fifth and seventh counts of the fifth amended complaint, improperly concluded that a genuine issue of material fact does not exist. We reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following undisputed facts. The defendant William B. Goldstein has maintained a contractual…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Golden v. Johnson Memorial Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- New Haven Savings Bank v. LaPlaceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Rosenfield v. Rogin, Nassau, Caplan, Lassman & Hirtle, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Cheverie v. Ashcraft & GerelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Bishel v. Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.